For the record, there is no way to improve on Margaret’s sermon this past Sunday. She did a fantastic job of giving voice to the absent “mother” in the Prodigal Son story of Luke 15. For me, it was as though Margaret’s retelling brought completion to an unfinished story, one missing a character key to the plot line and lesson Jesus is offering.
In the Luke account, Jesus makes very clear that the forgiving Father represents God. And yet, if we believe all people are created in the image of God – “Male and female, God created them”- then half of God is found in the male gender and half is found in the female. Anybody who only gives you only half that truth is only representing half the mystery of God. Is Jesus guilty of this? I don’t think so.
The father that Jesus described and knew looked amazingly like what most cultures would call mother. While likening the “father” to God, Jesus portrays him as a complex blend of the traditional patriarch… and matriarch. The God of Jesus’ parable is soft and hard, grace-filled and accountable, freeing and responsible, vulnerable and empowered, an optimist and realist, and both traditional and egalitarian.
Do you see it? God’s image is only fully represented in our beautiful diversity, “both male and female.” God is revealed in the collective masculine and feminine together, and to portray God any other way is an injustice.